“The Battle Is On To Save The Fort York Bridge”

Toronto Politics

4 minute read

May 11, 2011

Is this a new trend?

This is the second time in as many weeks that I’ve doubted my Facebook friend, Rob Ford.

True, it’s not Ford personally that is putting the kybosh on the bridge that would connect historic Fort York to the rest of civilization, but I’d like to think city council can work this into the budget…

“The Battle Is On To Save The Fort York Bridge”
By: Patrick White
Globe And Mail

It could be called the second Battle of York.

But in place of marauding Americans and hapless British redcoats are a phalanx of right-leaning city councillors against a ragtag crew from a range of ideological backgrounds.

The spoils of this war may not decide the fate of empires, but it will decide that of a foot and bike bridge connecting downtown Toronto to Fort York, that neglected island of history in the Gardiner Expressway’s shadow that was reduced to ruins two centuries ago in the War of 1812.

In 2007, city council voted to build a foot and bike bridge reconnecting the Fort with the city it once protected, timed for bicentennial celebrations next year. But at a public works committee meeting last month, budget-conscious councillors allied with Mayor Rob Ford deep-sixed those plans with a late-night motion to send the $22-million bridge – which was $4.4-million over original estimates – back to the designers for cost trimming.

Now, an unlikely patchwork of Torontonians are speaking up in the bridge’s defence.

“I would love to see the bridge happen,” said former Conservative politician John Tory, who sits on the fundraising panel for the Fort York Foundation, a group devoted to building a visitors centre on the site. “People have put a lot of thought into this. It didn’t just get approved in the middle of the night two weeks ago.”

The foundation has pledged to raise a quarter of the funds need to build a $23-million visitors centre.

While Mr. Tory says he hasn’t raised the issue with the mayor’s office, he has been talking about the bridge with several other foundation members, a group that includes former lieutenants-governor, political insiders and philanthropists.

At city hall, Councillor Mike Layton says he has convinced roughly 50 per cent of his political counterparts to reject the public works decision when it goes before city council next week. He’ll need two-thirds support to successfully overturn the decision.

“I’m putting the case to other councillors and getting some support in surprising places,” Mr. Layton said.

He’s also trying to enlist the help of Jim Flaherty, federal Finance Minister and friend of the mayor’s, who’s been supportive of projects across the Toronto waterfront.

“We know he’s sympathetic to the bridge, but they just won a majority so they are not answering phone calls,” Mr. Layton told a crowd of 20 condo dwellers on Monday night, who assembled to come up with ways to save the bridge. Joining Mr. Layton at the meeting was NDP MPP Rosario Marchese, who put his personal support behind Mr. Layton’s efforts and foresaw thousands of locals doing the same.

Mr. Layton has also enlisted help from condo developers around Fort York. At least one of them, Steve Diamond, has met with the mayor’s office about the matter.

“I think the cost of the bridge is a legitimate issue for the city to consider,” he said. “But I do think this bridge provides a very useful and practical amenity to existing neighbourhoods and new neighbourhoods in the area.”

Mr. Diamond estimates that his development would contribute around $2-million in development fees to the city, money he would be happy to see go toward the bridge.

The issue is pressing: If construction doesn’t start soon, the city will miss a narrow construction window provided by Metrolinx, pushing the building calendar months or years past the bicentennial.

“I’m sensitive to the timing with the bicentennial, but I don’t think it’s prudent to make a $22-million decision for a celebration that’s going to come and go very quickly,” said Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, chair of the public works committee. “There were concerns from the mayor’s office and the budget chief and so we decided to take another look at this.”


Maybe I’m just softening in my old age.

Perhaps all my anti-bike-lane rants will soon be replaced with suggestions on how to improve Green energy initiatives!

Hmm.  I don’t think so…

I’m not in favour of the Fort York bridge project because it helps walkers and bicyclists but rather because it promotes the city that I love and its tradition and history.

Fort York is as historic a site as any in the city of Toronto, and yet it remains unvisited, and almost unknown.

Ask a random sample of people under 25-years-old “What is Fort York, where is it, and what is it’s significance?”  I’d be willing to be that one in ten can answer those questions.  Come to think of it, ask a random sample of people OVER twenty-five, and I still don’t think the results would be favourable.

I’m definitely an economic conservative, and I used to laugh at the amount of money that David Miller handed out to starving artists who thought that weaving baskets was an occupation, and gave them our tax dollars while we worked at real jobs.

But I am, and always have been, in favour of promoting our city’s history and culture.

Coming this summer, like every other, is Gay Pride, Caribana, Taste of the Danforth, Beaches Jazz Fest, Buskerfest, The CNE, and a host of other festivals and activities that makes our city unique as well as a huge tourist attraction.

These events certainly promote our current culture, but what about our past?

Fort York is a beautiful albeit somewhat misplaced “park” in the middle of downtown Toronto, and I’ve never seen an advertisement or so much as a mention of the area suggesting that Torontonians come and see what it’s all about.

The $22 Million bridge isn’t without purpose, although I can see how it’s such an easy project for city council to shelve.

I agree with Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong that perhaps it’s not worth rushing to complete the project just so we can have it ready for the bicentennial, but I hope it’s not something that is put on hold with thoughts of eventually forgetting the initiative altogether.

One of the only ways to truly appreciate Fort York is to view it from the 49th floor of a condominium on Telegram Mews or Capreol, which of course is the only reason why anybody would ever set foot in one of those buildings, but I digress…

Okay – I’m putting this on my “to do” list for Summer, 2011: visit Fort York, spend an afternoon reading every single plaque and point of interest on the lands, and DEFINITELY catch a reenactment of the first and only war that pitted America vs. Canada.  There’s nothing quite as exhilarating as watching grown men pretend the year is 1812 while shooting muskets into the air and pretending to writhe around in pain!

Written By David Fleming

David Fleming is the author of Toronto Realty Blog, founded in 2007. He combined his passion for writing and real estate to create a space for honest information and two-way communication in a complex and dynamic market. David is a licensed Broker and the Broker of Record for Bosley – Toronto Realty Group

Find Out More About David Read More Posts

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

7 Comments

  1. Richard

    at 1:17 pm

    I agree with you 100% — Fort York should be heavily promoted. It’s a hidden gem of a tourist attraction.

    Like you, I am a fiscal conservative, but being fiscally conservative doesn’t mean being blind to future opportunities, and it doesn’t mean cutting and slashing like a barbarian horde. Bringing Fort York “into the fold” would be a tremendous boost to the local economy and go a long way toward revitalizing the waterfront.

    I support Rob Ford’s administration, but eliminating the foot bridge would be a very foolish move…

    Even for a conservative.

  2. Krupo

    at 8:34 pm

    The timing issue isn’t just about the bicentenial – once work starts on the train corridor they might make a mess of things and inhibit the ability to *ever* get the job done after a whole bunch of train-related infrastructure goes in.

    Also, I do believe beer-fest is held at Fort York – another reason to visit.

  3. johnny chase

    at 6:54 am

    This place if off Bathurst – it’s not like it’s on an island. $22M for a bridge is ridiculous. Wake up guys.

  4. Kyle

    at 9:11 am

    If they ever find the missing $28 million worht of Section 37 funds (much of which was probably contributed by developments near Fort York), from when Miller was in power they could build this bridge and a few other projects.

    http://www.thestar.com/news/article/989724–city-auditor-demands-review-to-find-missing-28-million

    On another note, if they do build this bridge, i truly hope it is worthy of what it is connecting to. I hope they don’t A) cheap out and build the world’s ugliest prefab eyesore or B) hire an idiot like Alsop or Liebeskind to build another big self-promoting wank.

  5. George

    at 10:11 am

    If someone can calculate the benefits to improving Fort York as a tourist attraction, then the costs can be analyzed properly. If tourism revenue increases $5 million per year because of a $22 million bridge, then great, let’s do it. If tourism revenue would be seemingly unaffected by the bridge, then I can see why it would be scrapped.

    If no one has any estimates as to the value of the benefits, then you can’t really justify the costs.

  6. lui

    at 8:44 am

    Let the private sector finance the bridge and let them have naming rights for the bridge.Why are people so against large businesses bankroll a project and let them use it as a advert placement for their company…I have no issue calling it the Rogers bridge or the Bell bridge.

  7. Joe Q.

    at 12:06 am

    So it looks like the vote went against the bridge, which will be sent back for re-design. The bridge will now certainly not be built in time for the bicentennial, and the papers are saying that because of impending work on the train tracks, it probably won’t happen for another 4-5 years at earliest.

    So long Fort York Bridge — you were a great idea but I guess you smelled too much like gravy.

Pick5 is a weekly series comparing and analyzing five residential properties based on price, style, location, and neighbourhood.

Search Posts