I was young.
Once…
And now, perhaps not so much.
A colleague of mine, who we’ll just call “A. Ettinger,” is one of the younger agents in the business and with our brokerage, and we got to chatting the other day.
Actually, I’m going to call her “Anya E.” just because that’s a little more anonymous, but in any event, we were discussing this phenomenon of “shared accommodations” and how it’s no longer a running joke in the city.
Anya has been sharing her thoughts on shared accommodations on this thing called “Tik Tok,” which apparently has nothing to do with clocks, and she’s quite active on there too: https://www.tiktok.com/@aserealty
Yeah, well, she’ll never know what it was like on ICQ back in the day and how your heart skipped a beat when you heard that “uh-oh” when a message was received. Y’all know what I’m talking about.
And those young folks, among whom youth is wasted, will never know the thrill of downloading MP3’s on Scour before “Napster” was even invented. Some of you may be old enough to remember Kazaa, Limewire, and Frostwire, but you’ll never know the glory of waiting 47 minutes to download a single song in MP3 form on a 14.4kb modem…
Anyway, I have Anya to thank for the following photos and listings because she put this up on her Tikkity-Talk or whatever the hell it’s called, and it had something like nine million views.
“Shared accommodations” are everywhere now and it’s a sign of just how bad our housing crisis is getting.
It’s one thing to see 18 offers on a property listed for sale (although not this fall…), and it’s another thing to see 20% appreciation in the average home price within four months (as has happened twice in the last seven years), but it’s another thing to see what’s become of the rental market.
I’ve written many stories on the rental market so far in 2023. Here are a select few:
March 24th, 2023: “Are We In A Rental Housing Crisis?”
May 10th, 2023: “Giving All Landlords A Bad Name”
May 12th, 2023: “Giving All Tenants A Bad Name”
September 18th, 2023: “Landlords & Tenants: The Modern-Day Hatfields & McCoys”
But today’s blog is going to explore something we’ve never delved into before.
What is a shared accommodation?
Well, at the most basic level, it’s having a roommate. We’ve all been there before. Except, not all of “us,” since the thought of sleeping in a 12 x 8 room on a single bed, next to another guy in his single bed, who I just met, for an entire year, scared me into living off-campus alone at the tender age of 18, but I digress…
Now, at the more complicated level, a “shared accommodation” in Toronto has spawned into something else.
It’s turned into something I could never imagine, like what you’re about to read in this ad…
Alright, so first and foremost, I don’t understand the emojis. Are those spools of yarn next to the “background,” and what’s with the straw huts next to “QUEEN SIZED BED?”
That aside, um, did you notice the part where this is an ad to share a bed with a stranger?
Damn. Our housing market is tough.
Or perhaps this isn’t indicative of “the depths of despair in our market,” and rather represents “ingenuity and capitalism.”
Maybe it’s somewhere in between?
Here’s a photo of the bed in question, by the way:
I’ve slept in worse.
But $900 to share a bed with another person?
There are so many jokes running through my head but I’m trying to be sympathetic here. It’s just odd, ya know? Perhaps most new things seem that way?
The ad specifies “looking for a female,” so while I might think this means the existing occupant is a female, you never know. It could be a guy looking to get weird. I did have a friend who once put an ad on Craigslist offering massages in Trinity Bellwoods Park for $50/hour, only to specify “female only.” Um, yeah, he and I aren’t that close anymore…
Up next we have a listing that’s not as odd as the bed-share, but equally as sad if it represents the current state of our rental market.
Here’s the ad posted online:
Shared room for rent.
Uh-huh.
Bunk beds.
Uh-huh.
I know what you’re thinking, and it’s okay.
I’m thinking the same thing…
Now, unlike the Step Brothers, the listing above isn’t for a shared bunk-bed.
That bunk bed belongs solely to he or she who possesses the $650 per month in rent.
The problem with the situation isn’t the bed itself.
The problem is with the room, or rather lack thereof.
Because in the very next photo, we zoom out and see where this bed is located:
It’s in the front foyer of this townhouse.
It’s in the entranceway. It’s next to the front door.
It’s one of those townhouses that has a pseudo “den” at the front of the unit that you effectively pass through to get anywhere else in the house.
So if the tenant is sleeping and the owner or another tenant comes home, they have to pass by the tenant’s bed.
So odd.
Here’s an interesting one:
Interesting.
A 4-bedroom condo?
I didn’t know they make those! There must be some sort of mistake!
Actually, it’s no mistake. It’s somebody turning a two-bedroom condo into a faux 4-bedroom.
Here’s the first photo of the “bedroom” in the unit:
Looks a bit suspect.
But if we see the room from another angle, we realize what this actually is…
It’s the front hallway.
That’s the door on the left.
The bed is where the shoes, bicycle, and grocery bags usually find space.
Somebody has taken a 2-bedroom condo and turned it into a 4-bedroom condo by putting up cheap doors and sectioning off areas of the condo.
Why “live” in the living room if you can turn it into a bedroom and have somebody pay to sleep there, right?
Now, if we take a step back for a moment, we can remember that not everybody can, should, or deserves to live alone.
Whatever happened to roommates, right?
Rob Carrick, the long-time personal finance columnist from the Globe & Mail, wrote this last week:
“In 10 Years, Will Canada Be A Country Of Roommates?”
In the end of the piece, he asks:
High costs are the new normal in housing, and that means more people living with roommate. Ten years from now, will only affluent singles be able to live the solo lifestyle?
But Rob is probably several years older than me and the experience that he described (attending university in Ottawa, probably in the 1990’s) isn’t what we’re talking about today.
Back in the day, you and three friends could pool your money and rent a four-bedroom house.
We all have those stories, both fond memories and awful nightmares we only re-live on occasion.
But what’s missing today, which was present back then, is choice.
We used to look around for roommates, then browse properties, then make a decision.
Today, the word in downtown Toronto is out – there’s no landlord that wants to rent to you and your other two 20-something buddies, even if you spend all your free time delivering food to the homeless, teaching art at an old folk’s home, and giving blood as you’re all universal donors.
It’s impossible for a “group of four buddies” to find a house in Toronto. It shouldn’t be, but we all know that it is.
Some of the “why” can be found in the ads I’ve just shown you above where some property owners are renting their front hall for $900/month, or where others are so particular, choosey, or downright odd that they want to lease the right side of their bed!
Then, some of the “why” can be found in a post like this, which I share because it’s topical, and not because I like doing so…
Is this really where we are in Toronto in 2023?
People are renting out one-bedroom condos to five tenants?
Hopefully not “people” but rather “person,” although whether it’s five tenants, four, or even three, landlords like this are taking advantage of housing shortage.
The above post is rich with hearsay and speculation, but it’s clearly coming from somewhere. And we already saw the example of the 2-bedroom condo being turned into a faux 4-bedroom, so it’s not that far-fetched to think that a property owner could be stashing four or five desperate Torontonians in a one-bedroom condo.
A bunk bed in the den? Really?
Suddenly, I’m reminded of Cosmo Kramer tucking his newfound foreign friends to sleep in their drawers within a large dresser.
So what’s worse: bunk beds in the den of a 1-bedroom condo with three other roommates, or renting the left-half of a stranger’s bed?
Have your pick!
KK
at 6:55 am
After reading this article, I can only shake my head and think – What have we done to this country?…I am a 70s baby – after an apartment, my parents were the proud owners of a small 3-bed brick bungalow…neighbours owned their homes and were mostly car salesmen and productive factory workers. Now those factories are gone, homes are turned into duplexes by investors – neighbourhood is not cared for We have tents in parks and under bridges and a whole section of the KP trail that no one wants to bike through anymore because it is full of needles and passed out victims of drug addiction. I am in Kingston. A student I know at Queen’s is sharing a BUNK BED in residence (those two single beds in the 12×8 room are suddenly looking attractive). I can only guess that we also have alot of these similar situations going on in rentals around the city (although I am not privy to them) – how can landlords think that it is OK to have someone live in a closet room and not have a safe means of escape if there is a fire? I do not understand how they sleep at night…
Sirgruper
at 9:41 am
Like the starting Simpsons reference Principal Skinner.
The rest…old is new. We used to call them illegal rooming houses.
JF007
at 12:41 pm
Concept of roommates in your adult working life is nothing new outside of Canada..before i got married i used to share an apartment as a means to defray costs and also since the roommate was from college was fun to hangout after work…i think what is shocking is the lack of affordability that folks in Toronto had for the longest time unlike other major metropolitan cities in the world and the suddenness with which it has evaporated…immigration and interest rates have seen to it that accommodation without roommates is probably a dream for large cohorts of people in GTA..and even if Interest rates come down i don’t think rents are
Steve
at 9:51 am
The concept of having roommates isn’t new even within Canada as David indicated, it’s more the combination of:
1) Due to demand outstripping supply the combinations of roommates that were once common for e.g. university aged people are no longer able to actually get a rental.
2) Due to demand outstripping supply we are seeing weird and wonderful combinations David is highlighting where someone isn’t renting anything vaguely resembling a legal bedroom or even a whole bed (!).
The takeaway here is not oh no I might have to get room mates it’s oh no I might have to get room mates and still end up sleeping in a closet.
Swansea Muse
at 1:34 pm
How long before City Council rubber stamps a Vacant Bedroom Tax?
I wish I was joking.
David Fleming
at 8:59 am
@ Swansea Muse
I’ve been saying this for a year. I’ve writtn about this multiple time in 2023.
“Underused Housing Tax,” they’ll call it.
“Forcing seniors from their homes,” I’ve predicted. And some readers accused me of gaslighting.
But just wait…
Frances
at 5:31 pm
They could fit two Bert & Ernie style single beds in that first condo and it would be more appealing than one queen sized bed. Rather them than me though.
Ace Goodheart
at 10:58 pm
This madness has come to our neighbourhood. We now have condo buildings full of shared suits with many more people living there, than was ever intended.
Many families I know live in two bedroom condos. So you have three kids and two spouses in a two bed unit.
Then, down the street you have a huge 7 bedroom house from the late 1800s with a three car garage, ten parking spots, a back yard you could play baseball in, occupied by one older lady who has owned it since the 1950s.
The contrast is striking.
It is something to see someone’s eyes light up when they realize that we live in our entire house. Not just the main floor. All the floors. Up we go to the third floor loft and they just can’t believe it.
All this space just for one family?
Not sure how this will end.
When 1% of the people occupy 90% of the housing and the other 99% are crammed in like sardines, it never ends well.
Socialist revolution anyone?