The Friday Rant: Control Yourself!

Opinion

9 minute read

December 17, 2010

The article I posted yesterday revealed that the average Canadian now has a debt-to-income ratio of almost 1.5.

When I stand up on my soap-box at Yonge & Dundas Square every Tuesday & Thursday at 3:17PM, one of the things I rant about the most is how much unnecessary spending goes on in today’s culture.

I’d like to start this rant by talking about the perfect example of glorified overspending: Bottle Service.

bottle-service.jpg

There’s a term in our society, and I apologize in advance if you have sensitive ears; to put it bluntly, it’s called “F*ck You Money.”

This refers to money that stems from somebody that is so rich that they don’t even feel the effects of spending it.

When you have so much money that it loses all value, and you can spend whatever you like, whenever you like, it’s called “F*ck you money.”  It means you can buy and sell people and just tell them where to go…

For these people, my following example of bottle service simply won’t apply.

But in my experience, the people getting bottle service at night-clubs are the working class who “let their hair down on weekends,” and end up being the part of Canada whose debt-to-income ratio is over 1.5.

Bottle service is the single most moronic way that you can spend your money in Toronto’s world of “entertainment.”  You heard it here first, folks!

If I wanted to feel “special,” I would get a dog and have him bring me my slippers every evening.  I would NOT go to a nightclub and order bottle service just to feel important.

Let’s examine the cost…

Say an average vodka-soda costs $6.00 at the bar.  You can drink all night for $6.00 per drink.  (bear in mind that I’m not cheap – I just refuse to frivolously overspend)

Now say you purchase a bottle in your all-important “private booth” which isn’t that private, makes it difficult to access the bathrooms and exits, and is cramped beyond belief, and let’s start counting…

The bottle costs $220, but that doesn’t include tax and tip.  I find it ironic that they can charge tax on the bottle, but I guess it’s now “a service” because it has the word “service” tagged on to the word “bottle.”

People routinely pay $300 for a bottle and it contains 26 ounces of alcohol – or 26 drinks.

Now, if you’re pouring your own drinks all night, you’re likely going to spill 3-4 ounces just from being a drunken moron.  So let’s call it 23 ounces now.

Also, consider that the people at your table will pour a few drinks for buddies or do shots with the neighbouring morons at the adjoining tables.  So let’s call it 20 ounces now.

Now consider that by pouring your own drinks all night, you’re basically drinking 1.5 times as much with each drink as you would get at the bar, but you don’t really acknowledge the effects.  So let’s call it 14 ounces now.

And finally, this happens:

bottle2.jpg

That’s right – you know what I’m talking about.

As soon as the bottle hits the table, the scavengers show up.

“Oh, hiiiii.  My name is Tegan, and this is Cassandra, Emily, and Ryder.  Mind if we join you?”

Of course not!  Why would we mind?  Four amazingly hot girls just showed up out of nowhere and sat down in our booth!  Oh-em-gee, OMG!  Here – let me pour you ladies all a drink!  Make it a double?

So let’s call it 6 ounces now…

So out of that entire bottle that you paid $300 for, you and your friends likely got 1-2 drinks each.

You’re basically paying $30 – $50 per drink when you could be getting them at the bar for $6.00 a piece.

YES, I know that this is an extreme exaggeration.  But is it really?  How many people do this every single weekend?

Again – the people that have “f*ck you money” don’t feel the effects.  But legions of 20 and 30-somethings head out in Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, Calgary, and perhaps even North Bay and do this every Friday and Saturday night.

A few years back, I went to a birthday party for my friend Marco at whatever nightclub happened to be hot for that three-month period.  I had an amazing time, spent some money, and partied with my good buddy Jeff at the bar. 

At the end of the night, Marco’s friend, George, who was 22-years-old and dropped out of university to work at GNC during the day and as a bouncer at Musik at night, approached me with a leather bill-fold and asked, “Yo!  You gonna throw on this?”

Apparently, George had racked up a $2,300 tab while “having a good time.”

I’m sorry, but spending $2,300 at 22-years-old goes well beyond having a good time.  I should also mention that this guy sank every penny he had in the world into buying a Mercedes that he couldn’t afford.

I felt bad in telling George that while I also had a great time, I “only” spent maybe $120 at the bar with my buddy Jeff, and I didn’t participate in the genitalia-measuring competition that he and his friends had engaged in by seeing who could spend the most money on $300 bottles.

Our society in 2010 has become nothing more than a contest to see who can spend the most money – money that they don’t have.

But perhaps the larger problem is that many people don’t understand money!  And it goes without saying that they certainly don’t understand credit.

A friend of mine, God bless his sweet, tender soul, is a starving musician – the kind of happy-go-lucky lad that believes our government should subsidize his life so that he can share his “art” with the world.

When we were younger, we played roller-hockey together and he was our goaltender.  While shopping for equipment one day, he produced his very first credit card!  Yay!  Our little boy’s all grown up!  He bought a pair of goalie pads for $199 plus tax, and never looked back.

Well, he looked back a few years later when he told me that his credit card was “maxed out” at $500 and he couldn’t understand how it happened so fast!  He told me that in those few years, he had NEVER made a single payment on his credit card because “It was just too easy not to.”

I asked him what he did with all the credit card statements that were mailed to him and he said, “I just kinda threw them in a pile on the floor and eventually I tossed them out.”

The 29% interest, compounded monthly, had turned his $228.85 purchase into a $500 debt that only continued to grow.

If you think this is an isolated example of people that don’t understand debt, think again!

My favourite example of this, and if you’ve read this on my blog – simply keep reading, is found in the movie Maxed Out.  I wrote an entire blog post about this movie HERE.

The saddest feature of this documentary film comes when the filmmaker heads down to Mississippi to discuss mounting credit woes with a poor, uneducated woman.

The filmmaker opens up a “Special Offer” that had been mailed to the Mississippi resident by a lending institution, offering a $5,000 cash advance that she could pay back with as little as $5.00 per month.  The filmmaker explains to her that this would end up costing her hundreds of thousands of dollars over the long run, and she replies, “Yeah……but I’d have five-thousand-daallas in mah pawket, nah wouldn’t I?”

With people like this living in our society, it’s no wonder the debt-to-income ratios are climbing.

But what about the educated, intelligent, middle-class who do understand credit?  Why are they continuing to spend beyond their means?

Well, I believe this goes back to the first day of economics class when we were told about “wants versus needs.”

Our society continues to confuse these two terms, and the personal consumption climbs and climbs…

For example, in 1985 my father bought me the Nintendo gaming system.  I used this gaming system for SEVEN years before Super Nintendo came out in 1992.  It wasn’t for another FOUR years that Nintendo:64 hit the market.

In today’s society, there is a new video game console available for purchase every single year.  Parents (via their kids) don’t know how to delay gratification for seven years like we did in the 1980’s, and thus a new system is purchased for young Billy.

Perhaps parents are too afraid of saying “no” to their kids these days.  I have some advice for parents: when you tell Billy that you won’t buy him the new game console that plugs directly into his brain, and he fires back, “Well Bobby’s parents bought it for him,” just tell him, “Well that’s because Bobby’s parents love him more than your mother and I love you!”  He’ll see the sarcasm – don’t worry.  And if he doesn’t, then it’s nothing years of therapy can’t cure later on in life.  Just look how I turned out!

I just don’t think that today’s society uses any sort of evaluation criteria when making consumer purchases.  I think the word “budget” is something most families believe is for the government to use, and has no place inside the home.

You don’t need that new game console every single Christmas just for Billy to love you.

You don’t need to re-decorate your bathroom every two years.

And if you don’t have the money, then why the hell are you doing it in the first place?

The concept of the credit card was so foreign to me when I got my first VISA.  I found it amazing that this card replaced cash, and at the end of the month I just wrote a check to the company and they’d send me an itemized list of all my purchases for FREE!  I thought, “How the hell do these companies make any money?”  It wasn’t until later on that I realized morons paid 29% interest…

I know that some people just “don’t have enough money to live,” and thus they need to use their VISA to pay for things.  But here’s a novel idea: get a freakin’ line of credit with a 7% interest rate instead of the 29% you pay on your VISA!

The word “VISA” is actually Spanish for “legalized loan-sharking.”

I’m not saying that every nine-year-old child should use a wooden $12 hockey stick from Canadian Tire, but Tiernan doesn’t need the same $329 graphite-composite-gold-diamond hockey stick that Tyler has.  And if both Turner and Tristan have the $400 model, it doesn’t mean that a family living on table scraps needs to compete with this.

Now that Christmas is upon us, I’ve been reading all these articles from “Financial Gurus” in the Globe and Post about how to save money around the holidays.  They say things like, “Keep track of your purchases so that you know what to expect when you receive your credit card statement in January.”

Is that really novel advice?  How about this, “If you don’t have $5,000 to spend, then don’t spend it.”

They talk about ‘Credit Card Statement Day’ like it’s some sort of Armageddon, and it really shouldn’t be.  Whatever happened to responsibility and accountability?  Consumers are acting like money has no value when they pile debt onto their credit cards, and then they act shocked and disappointed when they see the end result on their statements.

And even those consumers who do keep track of purchases are still spending too much because they’re buying things they don’t need.

Last night, I watched the world’s greatest comedian, David Cross, in his recent DVD “Bigger and Blackerer.”  I actually paused the video to write down the following assessment of needless consumer products, “Their existence is predicated on the false sense of necessity.”

Gosh-darn is he ever brilliant!  He takes out the “Sky Mall” magazine that we all see on the airplane and goes through the list of products such as the coffee mug with a clock on it that is described as, “A clever alternative to looking at your watch!”

Cross uses the extreme examples to prove his point, but don’t most goods and services in today’s society have an existence that is predicated on the false sense of necessity?

And even goods and services that do represent a quantifiable “need” are being over-bought.  Perhaps a $450,000 house will serve you just fine, but since the banks are lined up to lend you money, you may as well over-extend yourself and pick up the $540,000 house down the street.

Or, maybe that’s just how I see things.

I’ll sum this all up with a personal example.

A while back, I dated a much (much) younger girl.  She believed that I was “rich” because, as she put it, “You can buy anything you want…within reason.”  Within reason meaning that I’m not going to buy a lear-jet, but maybe I can buy an $8,000 fur coat tomorrow and it won’t really affect me.

I explained to her that being truly “rich” means you’re in the St. Regis Hotel in New York eating actual gold on your chocolate cake for $1,400 a pop.  As David Cross says, “If that’s not the ultimate ‘F*ck you’ to poor people, then I don’t know what is.”  That is being truly rich.  The rest of us have to worry about things like debt-to-income ratios.

But you know what?  I’m not going to buy an $8,000 fur coat tomorrow because I don’t need one, and I don’t want one.  But really, I just don’t need one.  I have a coat already, thanks.  In fact, I have several.

I think most people already have most of what they need but they want more.

They want better, newer, bigger, faster, shinier, cooler, sexier, sleeker, more expensive, more popular, more exciting, and last but not least – whatever their friends are getting.

But not everybody can afford to keep up with the Joneses, and thus we have to take on debt to do so.

Maybe the United States’ government is swimming in trillions of dollars worth of debt (click HERE to see their running debt clock), but it seems that their personal debt-to-income levels fall short of what we Canadians feel comfortable taking on.  That in itself scares the crap out of me…

Should we expect anything to change?  I doubt it.

And even when the government steps in and tries to legislate people out of taking on debt they can’t afford, the lenders always seem to find their way around it…

Written By David Fleming

David Fleming is the author of Toronto Realty Blog, founded in 2007. He combined his passion for writing and real estate to create a space for honest information and two-way communication in a complex and dynamic market. David is a licensed Broker and the Broker of Record for Bosley – Toronto Realty Group

Find Out More About David Read More Posts

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

19 Comments

  1. moonbeam!

    at 7:38 am

    I agree that not over-spending, and spending wisely does not mean one is cheap. The old adages still apply: save for a rainy day; always have cash in the bank; pay off credit cards each month or use a line of credit; live within your means; buy generic brands & shop in bulk for consumables; reduce, reuse, recycle.
    I believe: be thrifty whenever you can, and spend big on the people, events and items that are important to you!

  2. LC

    at 8:21 am

    I don’t understand how these people can sleep at night. I get nervous if I buy something for retail instead of waiting for it to go on sale.

    There is no concept of net worth today. And then the next day they print articles about the middle class disappearing in Toronto. No sh!t, Sherlock! If this spending continues, we’ll have millions walking around with no assets, just piles and piles of debt.

    The rich get richer, the poor get poorer, and the middle class is just keep pissing it all away.

  3. Michael K

    at 9:41 am

    Your post hit upon the very heart of Generation Me’s problem, that our sense of self-entitlement knows no bounds. I’m a Montrealer and can relate that on a Saturday night, the line up’s of douche v-neck tshirt wearing Jersey Shore wannabe’s on St Laurent Blvd stretches out the door of every club. Inside, you’ll find your typical early to mid 20-something eating a $50 plate of pasta and downing $200+ bottles of Skyy vodka. There is hardly any consideration of the cost incurred because either their parents will foot the bill or they simply accept it as a right of passage afforded to the young.

    My parents’ and grandparents’ generations worked hard to accumulate wealth and enjoyed it slowly, knowing that they didn’t have to spend frivolously to live well. My generation is spending that hard earned multi-generational capital at break-neck speed. It leaves me to wonder how our kids will turn out when they observe their parents living as greedy materialistic narcissists.

  4. buk

    at 10:56 am

    but we “NEED” to buy real estate?

  5. $%&*

    at 1:31 pm

    yeah but look how hot those chicks are!

  6. Kyle

    at 2:37 pm

    They really ought to make personal finance a mandatory course in school. Some would say that should be the responsibility of the parents, but unfortunately many parents could have used the course too.

  7. JG

    at 2:52 pm

    @$%&* –

    i especially like the leopard print bra.

    THAT ALONE is worth the $300.00 bottle!!

    Maybe these kids ran a Cost Benefit Analysis of their night and deemed this all was a good value.

    $300.00 a bottle for what would sell at LCBO for $40 = a night with the ladies….i don’t know…just saying…

    lol!!!

  8. Keith Dean

    at 3:11 pm

    I liked your example of bottle service at bars but I think you’re focusing too much on the younger generation, while the Globe article was speaking more to families. The younger generation has rich parents who will bail them out when they start to drown in debt, but it’s the families who ultimately have no choice but to accept the massive quantities of debt (well I suppose they could stop spending, but we seem to have collectively assumed this isn’t an option) and thus the debt to income levels will continue to rise on par with interest rates. However it’s quite interesting to note that major consumer expenditures such as plasma TVs and laptops have come down in cost likely over 50% in the past five years. You would think this might translate into some savings, but I suspect families just use this to purchase more of the same goods, or other goods they didn’t have before. Great post once again!

  9. David Fleming

    at 3:17 pm

    @ JG

    I knew somebody would bring that up eventually.

    The only flaw in my “bottle service is a microcosm of society’s need to frivolously over-spend” theory is that many guys accept that they are paying $40 for every drink via the bottle, all in order to meet women.

    The results are proven! Four guys reserve a booth and put down $1000 for three bottles and all the bells & whistles, and they are soon joined by women who (rightfully so – because they CAN!) feel like drinking for free all night.

    What’s the alternative?

    1) Approach a stranger at the bar, “Hi, my name is David. You have beautiful eyes. Wanna go out for a Big Mac?”

    2) The ever-popular “grind-behind” on the dance floor. This was a big move back in university when Ginuwine was singing “Pony.”

    3) Pretend you’re in a small town in 1955, bow, extend your hand, and ask, “May I have this dance?”

  10. David Fleming

    at 3:19 pm

    PS

    You must have really zoomed in to see the leopard-print bra. Trying to find it was like reading “Where’s Waldo”…

  11. CL

    at 3:57 pm

    This post was awesome! Summed up so much of what I say all the time!

  12. Gerrit

    at 4:27 pm

    Great article, though I must point out the one mistake – video game consoles still only come out every five years or so. The XBOX 360, PS3, & Wii all came out about 5 years ago.

    This will always be the case because the developers make very little money from the machines, and a lot from the games.

    /Nerd Rant

  13. Princess Clara

    at 4:53 pm

    @Gerrit i was going to mention that but i didnt wanna sound like a huge geek. lol.
    Now there are exceptions for video game consoles however that wernt available in the 80s.. like ipods for instance, where they do release a new one multiple times a year.

    😀
    /geek

  14. Jeremy

    at 8:39 pm

    Yeah, I could never understand how credit cards are a profitable business either :-p. Seems ridiculous. To me a credit card isn’t about credit at all, it’s just another way to pay, with money that I actually have.

    What I find interesting is the messaging that comes out during recessions about how much the economy depends on consumer activity. If people don’t buy stuff, business slows down, people get laid off, they don’t buy stuff, and so on. It’s not hard to get the impression that you’re doing the economy a favour by going into debt for the sake of fuelling the economic engine.

  15. Chuck

    at 12:33 am

    Warren Buffett, 1988:

    “I don’t have a problem with guilt about money. The way I see it is that my money represents an enormous number of claim checks on society. It’s like I have these little pieces of paper that I can turn into consumption.

    “If I wanted to, I could hire 10,000 people to do nothing but paint my picture every day for the rest of my life. And the GDP would go up. But the utility of the product would be zilch, and I would be keeping those 10,000 people from doing AIDS research, or teaching, or nursing. I don’t do that though. I don’t use very many of those claim checks.

    “There’s nothing material I want very much. And I’m going to give virtually all of those claim checks to charity when my wife and I die.”

  16. George

    at 6:09 pm

    Part of the problem is that it takes longer to get money now. With university requirements on most jobs and the roadblock of older workers lingering in the job market, alot of people are 30 years old before their net worth gets out of the red. What are those people supposed to do for housing and their lifestyle? Should they wait until they are 45 to buy things? That doesn’t sound like a fun life, and certainly not a life that facilitates forming a family.

    I see debt as a necessary consequence of the job situation.

  17. Krupo

    at 1:06 am

    Several thoughts arise –

    1. I can’t recall where I read it, but the industry term for “responsible credit card users who pay their bills in full and on time” is “deadbeat” – cheers to being a deadbeat! 🙂

    2. Of course when I was younger and didn’t realize this phenomenon existed, I too was a little confused by things like that VISA ad where the couple sees the ultra-luxe resort and they say:
    “Can we afford to?”
    “Can we afford NOT to?”

    Followed by montage of them living it up.

    And that’s why some people travel through Europe for a grand or two for a whole month, and others need ten times as much.

    3. A thought has been echoing through my mind as I’ve been seeing the clearance and boxing day sales popping up everywhere: “only suckers pay full price.” Seriously

    4. @George – clearly student debt is not Dave’s target. But I’ll pick up that ball anyway for kicks.
    So, university education: if you’re going to a private / deregulated program or a doctoral grad school thing, or simply have very little family support (i.e. free housing), then student debt is perhaps unavoidable.

    If, however, you’re “just” doing a typical undergrad, and can live with family while you’re studying then you can in fact juggle enough work to pay off your education and complete your studies at the same time. Many people do it. They may take a couple years extra longer to finish if things get truly tight, but look how you emerge:
    – debt-free
    – degree-in-hand
    – X years of job experience CONCURRENT with your education.

    Even if it’s “merely” a barrista/retail job, employers respect the signal you’re sending if you’re disciplined enough to pull in steady years of job experience coupled with your degree: a huge leg-up on the student who buried their nose in a book (or pretended to and just partied) and has nothing else on the resume.

  18. Matt

    at 1:50 pm

    Couldn’t agree more with this post. An example always enjoy is this:

    My parents are self made millionaires worth about $5 million (hardly upper crust).

    When I look around this city and see people in their 30’s driving the same Audi that my parents own it strikes my as utterly crazy.

    If we are indeed on the cusp of sustained growth in the emerging markets, there has never been a better time to put your money into appreciating assets. Cars and bottles of vodka don’t make it on that list.

  19. David Fleming

    at 3:05 pm

    @ Matt

    I can do you one better…

    An 18 year old receptionist in my office just told me, “Guess what? I’m getting the same car as you!”

    Her parents are buying her a Lexus IS 250.

    I’m 30 years old. I worked for seven years for that car, and I really only bought it because of the “image” that Realtors need to project.

    She’s 18 years old and just finished high school.

    There’s something so wrong with this picture…

Pick5 is a weekly series comparing and analyzing five residential properties based on price, style, location, and neighbourhood.

Search Posts