The Friday Rant: Wrap Us All In Bubble Paper!

The Friday Rant

7 minute read

June 25, 2021

“Happy Friday, folks,” is what I might be saying in this space on a normal day.

Happy Friday.

But is it?

Can it be?

Should those that are happy be forced not to be?

Should we look down on those that are happy, or try to encourage them not to be quite as elated, or at the very least, legislate against demonstrating positive feelings?

If a backwards world were even more backwards, would that simply turn it back around again?  I’m not sure anymore.  I truly understand the world in which we live, less and less each day, as we constantly search for problems, ways to be offended, and causes.  Oh, so many causes!

I want you to read this, carefully.  Then please, oh please, do me a favour, and read it again:

 

Dear Mr. Henley,

We wanted to take a moment to introduce ourselves!  We are Jane and Andrew Bryson and we’re a 36-year-old couple with two beautiful children, Rory and Taylor, and we’re also hoping to be the lucky family who buys your home tonight! 🙂

We have been looking for a home now for eight months and have made offers on two houses, and lost.  But we believe that all things happen for a reason because had we not lost on those two offers, we would have never found your home!

From the moment we stepped into your front foyer, we absolutely fell in love.  That century-old mosaic tile made my (Jane) heart melt as I studied classical architecture in university but never put my degree to work.  The period pieces in the home just spoke to me and renewed my passion for a love I feel I left behind!  The home is so spacious and the pride-of-ownership beams in every room.  It’s so well-cared-for, you can just feel it everywhere.  We never thought we could find a four-bedroom house in our area, in our price point, but this house is so perfect.  We always dreamed of each of the kids having their own room with one bedroom to be used as a playroom, as both Andrew and I had similar layouts growing.  The basement bedrooms are perfect for both our home offices!

In our search for the perfect home, a great school district has always been atop the list.  At times, we thought about sacrificing the size of the house to get into a better catchment, but we feel we can actually get the house we want AND the amazing Pine Woods Public School district!

Our family is incredibly active and that’s why we place a huge premium on your home’s proximity to the Memorial Grove Park.  Andrew and I took the kids there on the weekend after our showing and we couldn’t help but daydream about talking a short half-block walk to this park every night and every weekend.

We’re so excited to be presenting our offer to purchase your home this evening and we just wanted to put some faces to names in the sea of potential buyers you’ll surely have at your doorstep tonight!

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Jane, Andrew, Rory, & Taylor

 


 

I know what you’re thinking.

And we’re probably all thinking the same thing.

This kind of behaviour cannot be allowed, and we must introduce legislation to stop it.

Right?

Stay with me here, folks.  Because we can all agree that when you look at a photo like the one above, you want to discriminate against that family.  It’s impossible not to.  We don’t like white people, Asian people, happy families, smiling kids, dads who might have high-paying jobs, families who don’t own two cats, and properly-made beds.  We hate that.

Right?

ALL of us, and I mean ALL of us, are completely incapable of reading that letter, looking at that photo, and not discriminating.

Or at least, that’s what some members of society believe.

In the war to protect ourselves from ourselves, we’ve reached a new low.

The state of Oregon, which is one of the more overly progressive, backwards-bending, riot-loving places in North America, has introduced legislation to ban “love letters” to home owners.

Yes.

This country, which has many, many problems, has created a new one out of nowhere.

Here’s some shit you just can’t make up:

 


 

“One More Step Before Controversial Oregon Bill Becomes Law, Banning ‘Love Letters’ During Home Sales”

SALEM, OR (KPTV) – There is just one more step before a controversial bill, that could change the way many people buy homes, becomes law.  If signed by Oregon Gov. Kate Brown, House Bill 2550 will ban the practice of ‘love letters’ during a home sale.  The measure is to help avoid buyer selection based on race, sex, or religion in violation of federal fair housing laws.

Perhaps now more than ever in this housing boom, with major investment firms looking to buy up entire neighborhoods, buyers are looking to influence sellers any way they can.  That influence usually comes in the form of a personalized letter, sometimes with family photos and desires to live in that community.  What this bill would do is give seller’s agents the ability to reject those letters.  While the bill has already passed the House and Senate, there are people who feel this is a major overreach by lawmakers.

Duke Hubbard told FOX 12 he bought the bigger home his family needed in Gresham in February.

“We explained that we were in the process of adopting two more kids. Brother and sister, one and three years old.  Wanted to keep them together. And without knowing [the seller’s] position, they had just got through adopting their son’s kids.  Their son had passed away in a car wreck.  So, there was a little bit of…pulling on the heartstrings there, which we had no idea at the time that that had happened to them,” he said.

Hubbard said his bid came in at least $15,000 less than others.

While buyers will still be able to reach sellers directly, the measure still doesn’t sit well with buyers, especially first-time home buyers.  FOX 12 also heard from a couple realtors who feel censoring letters is undue interference, adding there are already laws in place to make discrimination illegal.

But the bill’s chief sponsor who is a real estate agent himself, Rep. Mark Meek, D-Clackamas County, said it’s implicit bias that’s the issue.

“The only way that I saw, and a way that we can practically and very simply eliminate that practice, is just to not allow those letters.  We’re not impinging on free speech, the buyer can still write the letter, but the seller’s agent is no longer required to pass that information along,” said Meek.

If the governor signs the bill into law, it will not take effect until January 1.

 


 

Come on, man.

Really?

Are we really at this point?

Yes, discrimination exists.  So does racism.  And in America?  Oh, don’t get me started.

But what does this legislation say about society’s view of itself?

The people who wrote this bill are basically accusing themselves of not being able to view that family photo above without finding a reason not to like people therein.  Or, they’re making the assumption that other people out there are inherently racist, and thus any information provided to the seller which could allow the sellers to identify the buyers, and thus evaluate and/or discriminate, must be BANNED.

This is what we’ve devolved into as a society.

Take another positive thing in life, like a heartfelt letter from an excited buyer to a home-seller, and turn it into a negative by always looking for a problem and always assuming the worst-case scenario is not merely possible, but virtually automatic.

So don’t allow buyers to communicate with sellers.  Protect us from ourselves, please!  We need it!  We can’t do anything in life without instructions!  Legislate how we must tie our shoes, because if we always tie the left shoe first, then the right shoe might feel bad!

But why stop there?

Along these lines of thinking, we’d also need legislation to ban offer prices ending in “18,” since that’s a sure-fire way to identify Jewish people.  And we’d need to ban offer prices ending in “888” since only an Asian would offer that, right?  But Jews also offer multiples of “18,” so we can’t have 36, or 48, or 72.

But what about the names on the offer?  I’m sure when Jacques St. Laurent and his lovely wife Marguerette Lacroix are reviewing an offer for their home in rural Quebec and the buyers are James English & Clara White, the Quebecois are going to pour gasoline on the offer and light it on fire!  Just the same, when Mr. & Mrs. Jones down in Dallas, Texas see that the “Cortez” family are attempting to purchase their home, well, those good ‘ole boys will just throw that offer in the back of their Ford F150, drive it to a shooting range, and pin it up on the target.

BLAMMO!

Alright, well how about a realistic example?

Let’s say that a couple from Toronto write a letter about their love for a particular house in Prince Edward County, and that seller hates the fact that yuppies from Toronto are buying houses in the country, and that seller decides not to sell to them.  Is that discrimination?

Yes.  Absolutely.

Is it any different than a seller writing on the MLS listing, “Blacks, Gays, & Jews need not submit offers”?

Yes.  Absolutely.

Discrimination is possible in all areas of life.  I’m a realist, so I’m going to inform the naive, right here, and right now, that it will never go away.  But if we continue to look for every single area in life where it could take place, and then try to eliminate that scenario, then we may as well just wrap ourselves in bubble-paper and stay home forever.

The idea that banning “love letters” to sellers is going to eliminate discrimination is ridiculous.  It’s classic legislation to show action, of which there is far too much in North America right now.

The irony is: I would have expected this legislation from the Canadian federal government, not a state government in the US of A.  The problem is: I can see somebody tapping maple syrup up here and then thinking, “Hey, that’s actually a great idea!”

There is real racism and discrimination going on in the world today.  The newspaper headlines this week were horrific, and a constant reminder that we’re only decades removed from genocide in our own backyard.

So why are law-makers spending their time trying to censor mail?

The sponsor of the Oregon bill said:

The only way that I saw, and a way that we can practically and very simply eliminate that practice, is just to not allow those letters.

But where does it end?

People who date are getting their hearts broken.  So the only way I see, and a way that we can practically and very simply eliminate that, is just to not allow dating.

Some people who speak are having a difference of opinions and often discussions can get heated.  So the only way I see, and a way that we can practically and very simply eliminate that, is just to not allow talking.

We are less than a decade away from bubble-wrap.  You heard it here first, folks.

I just can’t believe that this school of so-called thought has worked its way into the real estate industry.  I wish that people with power who can effect change would use their influence in more meaningful areas.  But that’s why we have democratic elections, right?  If those in charge aren’t getting the job done, we can vote them out, right?  Oh, wait, both the USA and Canada incessantly attempt to manipulate election laws, voting rights, processes, boundaries, and geography.

Depressing, right?

Ah, yeah.  Well, I might just curl up in a ball and pull up a nice, warm…………………piece of bubble-wrap.

Written By David Fleming

David Fleming is the author of Toronto Realty Blog, founded in 2007. He combined his passion for writing and real estate to create a space for honest information and two-way communication in a complex and dynamic market. David is a licensed Broker and the Broker of Record for Bosley – Toronto Realty Group

Find Out More About David Read More Posts

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

21 Comments

  1. Pingback: Best Real Estate Agent In GTA – The Friday Rant: Wrap Us All In Bubble Paper! – Toronto Realty Blog
  2. RPG

    at 8:18 am

    Lol bubble wrap. Thanks for the early morning chuckle!

    1. Ed

      at 10:02 am

      Great idea! Blanket sized bubble wrap!

    2. Ron Dwyer

      at 9:05 pm

      Great laugh if it wasn’t so sad what we are becoming. Within 10 years the capital of the world could easily shift to China. The west is becoming a shadow of what it once was (hiding from the next bougie monster virus lol).

  3. Peter

    at 9:13 am

    I’m all for banning the letters. Not due to concerns with discrimination, but because they are revolting! The only thing the letter above produced in me was a cringing embarrassment for the writers.

    1. marmota

      at 11:44 am

      But the authors don’t. You want to ban letter because you are embarrassed? Are you embarrassed of clowns too? perhaps we should ban them. How about your parents? were you embarrassed by your parents at some point? maybe we should ban them too!

  4. Marty

    at 9:29 am

    I’m glad you covered this, David.

    And I agree with your response.

    I’m struggling to find the best line above though. But I’ll go with:

    BLAMMO!

  5. Elle O'lelle

    at 10:06 am

    Is that dude actually 36? That’s a rough 36

    1. Caprice

      at 2:39 pm

      It’s just a stock photo of a “happy family in bed” from the interwebs.

  6. Daniel

    at 10:30 am

    “Today I’m going to take on yet another topic that nobody else would touch with a ten foot pole.” I can’t imagine David’s team when they discuss blog ideas in meetings. They must be cringing.

    1. Verbal Kint

      at 11:53 am

      David’s usual schtick: Try to gin up controversy even where none really exists. The bill passed 58-1 in the Oregon house (with one abstention), and 18-11-1 in the state senate. It doesn’t sound like this is too controversial in Oregon.

      It would be ironic if David’s bringing it to Ontario’s attention led to a similar rule being enacted here, though!

    2. DDofG

      at 9:51 pm

      For some reason David seems to see this sort of thing as the thin edge of the wedge, despite the fact that Oregon represents a minuscule 1.25% of the U.S. population. I mean, really…

  7. Bryan

    at 10:41 am

    Call me crazy(and perhaps off topic) but I’m actually having a pretty tough time even envisioning how this policy will help with avoiding discrimination. I think it is far more likely to actually do the opposite.

    Generally speaking, I always thought that the “cure” for racism was information. It’s very easy to generalize a group of people when you grow up in an area completely absent of them, but it’s much harder to marginalize Bob who works at the desk beside you because of his race/religion etc. Even if a person holds racist/discriminatory views, they generally will hold Bob as the exception to the “rule” they have in their heads…. because they know Bob.

    The more we know about someone, the less we use things like race, clothing, hairstyle, gender, religion etc to judge them. Would James English & Clara White not benefit by sending a letter in French to the sellers explaining who they are in addition to just being “some anglophones”? Maybe the Cortez family has a picture of their family in front of their own F150 on their Arizona ranch that could push a seller off of their “use the offer as target practice” position.

    Some people are racist. Making them see a person(or family) rather than just a race is the quickest way to get them to be less racist. Writing a letter explaining who you are is likely the quickest way to do that…. seems backwards to ban them to me.

  8. Jon H.

    at 1:00 pm

    I think David is missing the point, maybe on purpose.

    The problem is not necessarily that sellers will discriminate against the family in the letter. The problem is that sellers may discriminate in favour of the family in the letter – to the detriment of another potential buyer of a different race or ethnicity (ie white people choosing to sell to other white people because they fit a preconceived idea of a “nice family”).

    Imagine any other scenario where family photos were submitted in a financial transaction. How would we collectively feel if family photos were submitted in a mortgage application, or a car loan? Seems ikcy.

    And sure, other factors like lucky numbers and ethic sounding names may create similar problems, but that shouldn’t prevent us from trying to curb systemic racism where possible.

    1. Jeff316

      at 10:39 pm

      Someone gets it.

      But I think David actually gets it too, but this was too good a rant to pass up.

  9. Frances

    at 10:43 pm

    I’m fine with banning “love letters” because as a buyer I just want a level playing field. Sure, I could probably draft some soppy letter but I couldn’t be arsed and I would hate to lose out on a property because someone else was pulling this move. It should be obvious that we love the seller’s house and want to buy it – that’s why we are bidding in the first place. I would also take these letters with a pinch of salt – nothing to stop the buyer just making up a story they feel will tug on the heartstrings.

  10. Sirgruper

    at 12:01 am

    David, it begs the question why do some people use 888 or a multiple of chai (18) on their offer. To telegraph to the seller that I’m one of you and therefore sell to me vs the others. I actually wouldn’t mind such a ban as it does discriminate related to housing by preferring your group vs others. That used to happen in Toronto all the time and if you look at subdivision agreements from the 30’s and 40’s you see that you were not to sell to blacks, Jews, Irish, southern Italians, Asians and a host of others. Might be best that the APS should speak for itself and without the hints of affiliation to advantage and thus disadvantage others including by numbers. It is a logical extension of the Human Rights Code.

    1. Tristan

      at 12:15 pm

      Lol they’re not signalling their race these are their LUCKY numbers!!!

      1. Sirgruper

        at 8:50 pm

        Yes. Signalling their lucky or good fortune number by identity

  11. A Grant

    at 1:44 pm

    “The idea that banning “love letters” to sellers is going to eliminate discrimination is ridiculous.”

    So, what are you gonna do amiright? I mean discrimination is here stay, nothing the government can do.

    I’m not going to argue for or against the validity of this legislation. I will say there is ample evidence to demonstrate that given two equal mortgage applications/resumes/letters/etc., the only difference being the colour of an applicant’s skin, the white applicant always has a distinct advantage.

    And maybe you could have used this legislation, valid or not, as a jumping off point for a bigger discussion regarding the state of home ownership in Oregon that would lead to such a piece of legislation being considered.

    I mean Portland, despite its liberal bona fides, is one of the whitest cities in the US. That’s not an accident. When Oregon’s Constitution was adopted, it banned the entrance, property ownership, or residency to any Black person. Heck, until the 1960s, the Portland Realty Board had a rule declaring it unethical for an agent to sell property in a White neighbourhood to either a Black or Asian person

    And I haven’t even brought up the destruction of historic black neighbourhoods to make way for highway projects that benefited white suburbs. Or the systemic redlining that occurred throughout the country.

    That’s something worth getting on your soapbox to rant about.

Pick5 is a weekly series comparing and analyzing five residential properties based on price, style, location, and neighbourhood.

Search Posts