“Debt Alert”

Business | December 16, 2010

Fantastic!  This article in Tuesday’s Globe & Mail has inspired me for an epic FRIDAY RANT!

The article, which headlines that our debt-to-income ratio has increased 6.7% over last year alone, further reveals that our ratio is now higher than America’s!

I’ve always maintained that Toronto’s ‘new’ culture has spawned a generation of spendthrifts and people who can’t control their own finances, but this article shows it’s not just Toronto; it’s all of Canada…



Jeremy Torobin
Tavia Grant
Rita Trichur

The Globe & Mail, Tuesday December 14th, 2010.

Canadians’ debt-to-income ratio is now higher than Americans’ for the first time in a dozen years, leaving policy makers with a dilemma: Rein in spending and risk hampering the recovery, or do nothing and risk a cascading financial failure.

Measures that track Canadians’ ability to repay loans have shown an increase into record territory. A sudden shock, such as a drop in house prices or higher interest rates, would leave some homeowners unable to make their payments and trigger personal and corporate bankruptcies. That has policy makers ratcheting up warnings about the too-high level of consumer debt and acknowledging that more might have to be done if the situation worsens.

The ratio of household debt-to-disposable income reached the highest on record in the third quarter, at 148.1 per cent, Statistics Canada said Monday, a 6.7 per cent rise in Canadian household obligations from a year ago. The ratio tops the 147.2-per-cent ratio in the United States and comes as incomes fell 1.5 per cent during the same three-month period.

The report underscores a red flag that policy makers such as Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney have been raising for months – that some families are becoming increasingly vulnerable to the effects of potential job losses or other financial setbacks. Though interest rates aren’t likely to rise until about mid-2011, policy makers are worried that too many Canadians won’t be able to handle higher payments when they do. Further, the longer that rates stay low, the more abruptly they may need to rise to curb inflation when the economy improves.

At the same time, even as Mr. Carney frets about the growing debt – as he did again in a speech Monday to the Economic Club of Canada – he also warns that a pullback by consumers as they work to repair their personal balance sheets could impair the rebound and make things harder in the short term.

The central bank has raised interest rates three times since June, and the federal government has made it tougher for some borrowers to get mortgages. Those measures have had some effect, Mr. Carney said. “We’ve seen a bit of deceleration in the rate of growth of consumer debt, but it’s still growing faster than income,” he told reporters after his speech.

“The responsibility obviously starts with the individual, it extends to the financial institutions, and then we as policy makers need to ensure that a suite of policies are appropriate to ensure sustainable growth.”

In February, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty announced measures requiring borrowers to qualify for a five-year fixed-rate mortgage even if they choose a lower-rate variable mortgage. Also, when refinancing, homeowners may now withdraw no more than 90 per cent of the value of the property, down from 95 per cent.

Those measures fell short of some bankers’ recommendations for a significant reduction in the maximum amortization period of new mortgages, or a substantial increase in down payments.

The Globe and Mail reported Monday that Ottawa, in its pre-budget consultations, is in talks with Bay Street financial executives about possible further steps, but Mr. Flaherty said he sees no cause for extreme concern. If necessary, he told reporters outside Parliament, “We’ll tighten up the mortgage rules more.”

Acknowledging that the government is looking at the number of people who might not be able to afford to pay off their debts in the event of a sharp rise in unemployment, Mr. Flaherty said “it’s a matter of concern but it’s not a matter with respect to which we’re going to act immediately.”

“We continue to warn Canadian households that interest rates are unlikely to go down in the future,” Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Monday. “They’re far more likely to go up, so Canadians should plan accordingly.”

Economists and analysts, meanwhile, echo Mr. Carney’s warnings about the potential threats to the financial system. For instance, if too many borrowers default on their debts, banks could tighten lending standards for everyone else.

“It’s an elastic band that’s stretching and the question is, how far can you stretch it? We have no clue how far it can go,” said Queen’s University finance professor Louis Gagnon.

Much of the surge in debt stems from a flurry of home-buying triggered by record-low interest rates and the belief that values will continue to rise. But the Bank of Canada says the risk of a “negative shock” to property prices has grown.

In addition to mortgages, Canadians have been borrowing heavily on their personal lines of credit, with many of those loans secured against their homes. “We are levering more and more against the housing sector in Canada,” Mr. Carney said Monday.

As well, Canadians increasingly have no buffer in their budgets, said Jeffrey Schwartz, executive director of Consolidated Credit Counseling Services of Canada. He said the volume of calls has risen about 15 per cent this year, led by growth among older Canadians who are supporting family members.

“Interest rates could rise, work hours could be cut, the labour market could soften – but it’s almost like people need a crisis or shock … before they make any drastic changes.”

Debt may be growing in Canada, but so is household net worth, which expanded 2.7 per cent in the third quarter as stock markets rose, the strongest quarterly growth in a year. The average household net worth is $178,600 per person, up from a year earlier but at its slowest pace since the recession.

As a result, not everyone is pushing the panic button.

“The singular focus on debt portrays an overly negative picture of Canadian household finances, which have proven incredibly resilient this cycle and likely still have enough cushion to provide a soft landing for spending in the year ahead,” BMO said in a report Monday.


There is an EPIC “Friday Rant” coming tomorrow.

Stay tuned…

Back To Top

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published.


  1. Kyle

    at 10:33 am

    I would say a big driver behind the growing debt is the big difference between what the middle class perceives they “should” have and what they responsibly “can” actually afford. To comfortably afford what most people think of as a middle-class lifestyle (detached house, car(s), vacations, 5 or 6 activities for each kid, and entertainment), you actually have to be earning far more than the middle class income, otherwise you’re really just renting all those things from the banks and credit companies.

    There is a silver lining though. When it comes time to downsize their lifestyles most people should be able to find lots of fat to cut before they really hurt. You know the nice to have stuff most people can actually live without (the cell phones for each member of the family, the top of the line TV and cable package, the gaming systems, the 5 different activities for each of the kids, the vacations, the eating out, the weekly shopping trips at the mall, etc).

  2. LC

    at 1:48 pm

    Carney can’t have it both ways, but it doesn’t matter because ultimately rates won’t move substantially until the US emerges from the depths of darkness. I’m willing to wager that he may even have to drop them again if the US experiences a double dip recession.

    But the real issue here is that the government can’t legislate against stupidity.

  3. LM

    at 10:52 pm

    hence WHY to buy real estate, no? artificially low rates combined with roaring economy = hard asset prices go through the roof.
    BOC can’t raise rates while the US keeps theirs at rock bottom because the Canadian dollar rally that would ensue would make our industry/ manufacturing too uncompetitive.
    So what are they going to do? Looks like their strategy is to talk tough and hope it has an effect … but would Carney dare to actually risk sending Canadian GDP into a tailspin with US rates at zero for the forseeable future?

  4. Kristeen Smith

    at 2:04 am


    I am Kristeen Smith and I am a member of some financial communities. I just visited your site https://torontorealtyblog.com and I am a frequent reader of your site. The articles of your blog is really worth reading. The quality of your content is excellent.
    After seeing this, I would like to request you something. I love to write financial articles and I would like to contribute something for your site if you’ll give me the permission. I can give you an original guest post and I assure you that it will be published only in your site. If you want, you can suggest me the topic also and I will write accordingly.

    Please let me know your thoughts. Waiting for your positive reply. Reach me at: @GMAIL.COM


Back To Comments