TRB Special Guest Blog: Matthew Morrison

Stories!

11 minute read

April 6, 2022

Check, check……is this thing on?

I don’t know what to say, but it’s an honour to be here!

Wait, what do you mean I can’t just copy what Chris said on Monday?!? As the team’s de facto millennial punching bag, I’ve read blogs in this space enough times to know that I’m entitled to things coming easily or even being given to me, and writing a substitute blog post should be no exception.

Do I feel obligated to disclose that I’m typing this from my Peloton, as I eat avocado toast, drink an oat-milk, double whip, non-fat, half-caffeinated, sugar-free Starbucks coffee while checking my texts on the newest version iPhone? No, no I do not.

I’m speaking tongue in cheek of course, but in preparing for writing this I did find that there are five separate instances of David uniquely blasting the consumption of avocado toast, among other “millennial” hobbies.

OK – to be honest, I do have a Peloton at home that I don’t use nearly as much as I like. It’s great for hanging laundry, however. I don’t eat avocado toast as I’m mildly allergic and it makes my mouth itchy. Until last year I used an iPhone 7. And I drink coffee at home every morning, and then usually get Tim Horton’s as it is closest to our office while also being David’s coffee of choice. I guess I’m not your quintessential stereotypical Millennial?

So let’s try this again…

Hey. How are you? I’m Matthew Morrison. Sorry to disappoint, but David is gone for a full week. You’re stuck with me. Oh, and it’s also the day after the TRREB market stats came out? Talk about a no-win situation. Sort of like being a millennial first-time home buyer in the Toronto Real Estate market, am I right? (More on this later)

I’ve been a reader of this blog on and off for about ten years. That’s when I met Dave. He was my baseball coach in high school. Yes, for you long-time readers I was once one of the infamous “baseball kids” Dave referenced many times. Dave and I stayed in touch. He became a sort of mentor to me, both personally and professionally. We’d get together throughout my university years with a few of the other “baseball kids”, and I was even one of eight baseball kids invited to his wedding. I don’t know how he managed to convince Jenna to let that happen, but a shout out to her for being so easygoing.

But how did I get here.. well following my graduation from Queen’s University, I joined the sales team at BMO Wealth Management, wholesaling Mutual Funds and ETFs. In simplest terms, my job was to convince your Investment Advisor to put our products into your portfolio. It was an amazing first job – I made lifelong friends (some of whom are now clients) and learned a ton. I worked there for four years, almost to the day. I had two different roles, and covered five different regions. However, like many jobs, for me, it became clear it was time to move on. And just when I was trying to figure out what that next job was (I was weighing something else in the financial world or something that I could transfer my sales skillset over to), I received an email from Dave one Friday afternoon that would quite literally change the rest of my life:

“When are you going to quit your job and come work for me?”

Within three minutes I had picked the phone up to call him. I remember him yelling to Chris in the office next door “Hey Chris, I told you he’d call me right away.” I didn’t know if I should feel proud or embarrassed about that. After a few weeks of deliberation and some difficult conversations, I had decided – that I was becoming a Real Estate Agent.

And now, three years and an entire global pandemic later, having developed a number of different learnings, scars, experiences, and above all a thicker skin, I’m writing a post on the blog I used to read ten years ago, hoping that there would be a reference to the aforementioned “Baseball Kids”. I guess I was a little self-centred as a teen? Fun fact: I am in fact specifically referenced in an old post. Even though I think Dave was clearly pointing out how out of touch my opinion was in telling that story, I still wore it like a badge of honour. And no, I won’t tell you which Blog Post it is.

All this preamble was done to 1) Pay homage to Dave’s legendary off-topic and long-winded intros, 2) introduce who I am and 3) set-up the topic of the day: what is it really like trying to buy the first home in this market as a millennial (or otherwise).

As the team member that works with the majority of our first-time home-buyers (condo or freehold), and someone who’s peers are going through this right now, I figured I could share some interesting insights into that first home purchase process.

What’s it like?

This probably won’t come as a surprise to any of you, so I won’t bury the lede: It’s really *bleeping* hard. I don’t say this to complain. You’ll have to trust me on this, but I completely understand why prices of homes are the way they are. Toronto has a massive imbalance of supply and demand. I also feel obliged to say here that I don’t think prices are unfair, per se, but I know most people are miffed, to say the least, about the price of Toronto Real Estate.

In an ideal world, everyone who wanted to own in Toronto could do so. I’ve had conversations with close friends of mine who said without certainty of a doubt that they will never own in Toronto, and by extension don’t intend to live in Toronto long-term. To be honest, that bums me out a lot. I wish they could live close to me forever, and I could help them with their real estate endeavours. The truth is though, either on an account of affordability in general or affordability of the certain aspects of a home they’ve decided they require, they reached the conclusion that Toronto is not for them. And as I said, that’s disappointing, but I think ultimately that’s OK.

At the risk of sounding too cold, I don’t believe anyone should simply deserve to own in Toronto. If they can, great! Market Powers are at force though, and quite frankly I sense a growing entitlement to owning a forever home or even a starter home under the age of 30 in this world-class city.

I think therein lies the biggest disconnect though. “World-class city”. Because Toronto hasn’t always been that way. In fact, I’d call Toronto a “First Generation World-Class City”. And as such, my fellow millennials and I are the first generation of Torontonians that have to pay world-class prices for Real Estate. The idea of owning Real Estate in Manhattan, or London proper, or Paris is quite frankly a pipe-dream for anyone but the most financially elite. But that’s the type of city and real estate market Toronto has been emulating and chasing down (and closing the gap on) over the past two decades or so. Just look at the net immigration numbers over the past two decades, domestic or international.

I have a client who’s brother lives in London, England and he worked and saved his entire adult life as a successful finance professional. Last month, he finally decided the time was right to stop renting and buy. That’s the amount of work and time it takes to buy a proper family home in London. In Toronto, there’s an expectation that doing so is something one should be able to do in their 20s. Why? Because that’s what our parents were able to do. And because there was a tweet that went viral last week saying that the housing market is broken because the average home in Orillia, Ontario costs the same as an average house in Los Angeles, California. And, perhaps most importantly, because the increase in value of the average home in this city has far outstripped the average wage increase over the last thirty or forty years.

But who says wages and home prices need to be intrinsically linked? Housing, like employment, is a market. No different than equities, bonds, and currencies. The Russian Ruble gets one a lot less house in Toronto than it did two months ago. One can get a lot less Apple stock for 1% of an average Toronto income these days than one could in the late 90s. Is that coldly capitalistic? Probably. But we live in a coldly capitalistic world, and the powers that be once upon a time decided that housing is no exception. Can that change? Possibly. But there is a significant vested interested, based on the portfolios of decision makers, lobbyists, and voters to keep Real Estate costs high. Organized Real Estate, as it exists, is built to favour sellers of Real Estate. Which makes the hardest transaction a buyer will ever make his or her first, and especially if you’re behind the curve in this “First Generation World-Class City”.

Sounds pretty bleak then, doesn’t it? If you’re a first-time millennial buyer though, there is hope. You can live in Toronto. How do I know? I’ve helped countless people do it over the past years.

In the spirit of being transparent, I haven’t yet done so myself. My girlfriend Madeline and I moved in together about a year ago, the first time either of us have lived with a partner. We faced many of the challenges I’ve already outlined, but I do believe we could have made it work. Buying as a couple is one of the best ways to actually make a purchase feasible in this city. We made a decision however to rent first.

We figured that there was a non-zero chance that living together would make us realize we weren’t “meant-to-be” for the rest of our lives, and our worry was owning together would make us try to make the relationship work longer than maybe was best for either of us. Or, even if we were able to make that difficult decision in a timely manner, it’s far more difficult to unwind shared ownership than it is to unwind a shared rental. So we did rent. We tried out living together. We tried out a neighbourhood new to both of us. We’ve been thrilled with both. Our plan is to buy sometime in the coming year. Did that decision cost us ~15% of market appreciation? It certainly did. But we made that decision knowing that was possible, and I think the logic was sound regardless of the outcome.

Enough about me though. How does one of my peers or one of my clients make this all work. I’ve mentioned purchasing as a couple. The problem is, not everyone has a relationship at the time they want to venture into homeownership that either exists or has the track record or future runway to support this massive undertaking. The next obvious answer I generally see – and the one that seems to be dominating the headlines – is parental financial assistance.

Say what you want about this concept, but I can tell you both anecdotally as well as by referencing countless studies that have already been linked on this blog that this strategy is happening and is happening all over the place. It makes sense. Affluent parents accelerate the exchange of part or all of the inheritance they’ve worked so hard to leave their children, and in doing so get to keep them close and witness them enjoying the fruits of said labour. All the while, they bypass probate and other potential taxable considerations on their death, and give their child a boost into this “first-generation world class” city’s Real Estate market.

But this strategy is a strategy derived from privilege, one that is only available to some. Add to that the consideration that it’s very easy to connect the dots and see that this just helps rich families get richer, and it’s not popular in all circles. So if a buyer is against it, or doesn’t have access to it, what other choices are they offered.

What about starting lower on the housing ladder? If I was to point to the most legitimate argument I’ve heard about millennial entitlement, it would probably be this: Your first home likely won’t be your forever home. If you want it to be, it almost certainly won’t be in Toronto. We all have different definitions of “affordable”, but the truth is there are residences available in this city in certain locations or of certain sizes that sell way below the “average” sale price. Sure, it’s not a detached home or even a semi-detached home south of Bloor, nor is it a 1,000 square foot condo in King West or St Lawrence Market, but one of the best things about Toronto is we have an intensely livable city, with safe, unique and cultured neighbourhoods all over. I’ve worked with countless people who have made a ton of money on paper or by selling and realizing profits by buying a condo that wasn’t their first choice.

Is it suboptimal? Perhaps. But those people made a choice. They wanted to live in Toronto, and they wanted to do so within a certain budget, and they made choices to work within those two parameters. From there, the next purchase they made offered them more flexibility after making all the money they did on Condo #1.

I’ve also worked with countless people who were able to get all they wanted by choosing to live in Newmarket, or Aurora, or Milton. Again, they chose to compromise, but when the time comes for them to pick a new house they will have the financial flexibility to be more discriminatory with the location.

Finally, there’s one other option I want to outline. What’s so wrong with renting? I have a very intelligent friend who I have an immense respect for. He’s about as well-read and disciplined on a whole slew of topics as anyone I know. To be blunt, he’s a 70-year-old man trapped in a millennial’s body. He also happens to be an Engineer who is Toronto-born and raised and was educated at Queen’s before completing a masters of Physics in Alberta. He’s long articulated to me that there’s a financial case to be made that renting is a better choice than buying.

In order to make sure I was paraphrasing him correctly, I texted him (how millennial of me). To be frank, I wasn’t expecting his response to have his lack of conviction. Typically he speaks in absolutes and can be quite argumentative. Perhaps he was afraid of not coming across nuanced online. In any event, he said the following:

“Of the literature I’ve read, being several newspaper articles and I believe there was a book too), the argument is that owning isn’t a slam dunk better option than renting, at least compared to how it is perceived”.

Even this toeing the line response however begs the question: If it isn’t the slam dunk financially better option, why are we all so desperate to make homeownership happen? I gave this some thought, I reached a few possible conclusions:

  1. It’s what our parents did/expect of us (This can be rebutted by saying circumstance has changed – see: First Generation World Class City)
  2. Pursuit of some version of the proverbial “American Dream”
  3. Fear of missing out (again, how millennial) of future financial gains, or more instructively even the financial gains people have made in the past ten years. (Best investors I know are coulda, shoulda and woulda).
  4. To show off on Instagram to our peers. “Keeping up with the Jones’s” in on steroids now in this generation, specifically because social media is so prevalent.

I think the point is though, renting isn’t so bad. Especially, and this is important given my generation’s propensity to not stay in one place for so long. As we all know, switching costs of real estate in this province are high, prohibitively high even (topic for another day). My friend said, “the argument is stronger if you aren’t strongly committed to a specific location for a long period of time”. Did he just perfectly describe a millennial? Regardless, I think the stigma against renting, or perhaps misguided desires to own, is impacting our satisfaction with our current situation, or our motivations to change said situation.

Wow. I can’t believe I typed almost 3,000 words. I’ll echo what Chris said on Monday. Hats off to Dave for doing this three times a week since the day we met on the baseball diamond at Talbot Park. Impressive, really.

I also hope I added some valuable insights here. If not, I at least hope I changed your perceptions on millennials – I think many of us get painted with an unfair brush.

A word I learned in first-year Politics was “normative”, if my memory is working correctly, it was defined as “how things ought to be”. As I’ve matured, I think I and many of my peers realized the concept of “normative” is but a fairy tale. The world we live in is anything but normative. Homeownership in Toronto is anything but normative. Whatever was once normative got smashed into a million pieces when Toronto became something of a “world-class” city.

As I said, I think that’s ok. There are ways to work around this, and if none of those options make sense, there are a ton of other fantastic places in this province, country, and world to live. And if you must live in Toronto, smarter people than I have tried to argue before that renting isn’t so bad either.

But…

If after everything I said, any millennials out there are still  ambitious or defiant enough to think homeownership in Toronto is something they want to chase, I’m left with only one question for you:

“When should we get started?”

Written By David Fleming

David Fleming is the author of Toronto Realty Blog, founded in 2007. He combined his passion for writing and real estate to create a space for honest information and two-way communication in a complex and dynamic market. David is a licensed Broker and the Broker of Record for Bosley – Toronto Realty Group

Find Out More About David Read More Posts

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

38 Comments

  1. A Grant

    at 8:00 am

    “But who says wages and home prices need to be intrinsically linked? Housing, like employment, is a market.”

    While understanding that is now the reality, it doesn’t make it any less palatable. Maybe because shelter, like food, is a necessity.

    Similarly, if we’re going to tout housing as simply another investment (as this blog so often does), perhaps we also have to accept that homeowners will want to protect that investment. Especially considering that equity in homes can account for over one third of people’s net worth.

    So instead of decrying homeowners for impeding development via land-use regulations (as this blog so often does), perhaps we need to consider it a welcome side effect of investors simply trying to protect (and increase!) the value of their greatest asset.

    1. Matthew Morrison

      at 8:26 am

      A Grant,

      Thanks for taking the time to read, and especially the time to comment.

      I’d be lying if I didn’t say that point of portion of the blog was the one I was most hesitant to include. The disconnect between wages and house prices does make me uneasy – it is hard to palate as you said. Shelter is a necessity (shoutout to Maslow) and it is certainly cruelly capitalistic to set financial barriers to that necessity. I suppose I was simply trying to articulate that I think in our society filled with cruel, capitalistic norms that it is curious this is the one that seems to garner the most attention.

      Perhaps it’s because it’s the most fundamental thing being impacted by these norms? Perhaps I’m just biased in assuming that’s the issue that is this most hot-button because I am both working in Real Estate and also a millennial surrounded by peers who are struggling with this issue on a daily basis.

      The truth is, and this isn’t some mind blowing revelation, I don’t have the answers, and I hope I didn’t come across as pretending to in this piece. For me, it was an opportunity to flex my writing muscles for the first time since University in Dave’s absence, give words a number of different thoughts I’ve had over the past few years on this issue, and offer a perspective readers of this blog may not often get exposure to.

      My renting motivated friend who I referenced in the piece read the post last night, and told me it was “a little harsh”. Truthfully, I get feedback like that a lot. I speak bluntly, I’m used to being called harsh. What I hope came through at least in some capacity though, is my empathy to the situation. I wish it were simpler for my generation, and that concessions and compromises didn’t have to be made.

      I think your broader point hits the nail on the head though. Everyone (with a few exceptions) is self-motivated. First time buyers want the prices to be lowered, home owners want to stymie development and keep the prices of their largest investments high. Governments want to appeal to the most influential voter bases. In a nuanced situation with multiple different groups of stakeholders all with different motivations, it’s a difficult knot to untie. Especially with a system that’s been established as the norm for decades.

      Matthew

      1. A Grant

        at 8:39 am

        Hi Matthew

        Honestly the comment section why I like this blog so much.

        As a card carrying lefty pinko, whose only experience with housing is as a buyer/seller in the Ottawa market, my main interest in this blog is from an urban development perspective. And the commenters here tend to understand that the issues around housing, affordability, and urban development are complex

        And as much as we’d like simple answers that fit neatly on a bumper sticker, that’s simply never going to be the case.

      2. Appraiser*

        at 10:48 am

        “What I hope came through at least in some capacity though, is my empathy to the situation.”

        ????????????????

        Realtors != empathy

        Lmao

        1. Appraiser*

          at 1:32 pm

          Hey imposter – bite me!

    2. Kyle

      at 9:51 am

      First let me say, excellent post Matthew!

      @A Grant, i don’t necessarily agree that increasing affordability / attainability has to be at odds with protecting home owners’ equity. It is only that way because of our City’s planning.

      Upzoning the yellow belt would achieve both. Affordability increases with more homes available home and values increase when every lot has a potentially higher and better use. It would also redirect investor demand from purchasing homes to building them. The real obstacle is the City.

      The Province has mandated municipalities to add secondary units and ADUs and Toronto has been doing everything in their power to slow its uptake, while patting themselves on the back for adopting things that they are mandated to do. Anytime they do adopt something, it is full of limiting factors, that make it impractical to actually build. Toronto’s laneway house rules are so restrictive that very few houses actually qualify for the fire access rules, which state a home must have a 1 meter wide access no longer than 45m (apparently the length a fire hose) from the street. You would think in 2022, that we’d have a way to join two hoses or more together, so that we don’t need to codify such limitations into a City’s official plan, but that’s just one example of how the City makes it very difficult for any non-developer to actually do anything.

      1. Matthew Morrison

        at 10:01 am

        Thank you Kyle!

  2. Daniel

    at 9:03 am

    Bravo! Absolutely love this one!

    1. Matthew Morrison

      at 9:07 am

      Thanks Daniel!

      Appreciate you reading and the positive feedback!

  3. Appraiser*

    at 10:44 am

    Boom. Canada 5y yield passes 2.6%.
    ????

    More and more emails from agents:

    “X Price. OFFERS ANYTIME! Motivated seller. Commish + bonus if sold by x date!”

    Sign of the times. Desperate agents never been thru a slowdown and the beginning of a big decline. Not even 25 bps in.

    Buyers: don’t get fooled, showings and offer nights are dead. Rising rates to the moon!!

    Realtors don’t give af about you or anything other than their commission like any other sales person. Take dat commission and run for the hills.

    1. Jennifer

      at 12:36 pm

      In Riverdale, it seems the majority or at least half the houses are still selling via bully offers a day after listing or so. Which area(s) are you referencing?

      1. Jon

        at 1:14 pm

        I think this is one of those fake/clone comments David mentioned below.

        David I know you’re all about authenticity but maybe the comments section are better off without these.

      2. Mike Stevenson

        at 12:43 am

        FWIW, I follow the neighbourhood at Leslie/Steeles pretty closely and the three listings there are well into their third week.

  4. London Agent

    at 11:24 am

    Good stuff! I agree, buyers need to realize what their counterparts in other countries experience when they are looking to buy their first homes. Canada is desirable!

    1. Matthew Morrison

      at 11:38 am

      Thanks!

  5. David Fleming

    at 11:51 am

    @ Appraiser* & Condodweller*

    Alright, we get it. You’re a regular reader and you know the regular commenters on here.

    I have no issue with you posting. In fact, I think your cynicism, sarcasm, snark, and wit will play well here.

    But I won’t have you use the regular commenters’ handles. It’s disrespectful.

    So pick a new handle and do it now. Any further comments will be deleted and your IP address will be blocked from the back end.

    I’ve also deleted your comments from last week where you pretended to be a real estate agent and talked about failed offer nights and decreasing showings. Also, you posted two years ago under your real email address so I know who you are.

    Thx!

    David.

    1. Jennifer

      at 12:37 pm

      Oh. Tricksters!

    2. Appraiser

      at 12:03 pm

      Thanks David !

  6. Moonbeam!

    at 12:23 pm

    Hi Matthew- terrific post, I enjoyed reading your backstory and your take on real estate and finances.. Well thought out & written. Also I fondly remember the baseball kids at David’s wedding!

    1. Matthew Morrison

      at 12:33 pm

      Moonbeam! Somewhere in the bowels of the internet there is a video of seven of us baseball kids dancing while Dave, Jenna and the guests were serenaded by the eighth of us.. I hope that video never resurfaces!

    2. Libertarian

      at 3:04 pm

      Is mom writing Friday’s blog?

      1. Sirgruper

        at 9:31 am

        Excellent idea!

  7. Daphne D

    at 2:40 pm

    Another pair of David’s shoes have been filled! Thanks Matthew (from an ex BMO internal auditor).

  8. Ed

    at 4:04 pm

    Does anybody want to explain the baseball or are we left to figure this out on our own?

    1. Mike Stevenson

      at 12:47 am

      Clear reference to the housing bull market being in the 9th inning.

      1. Condodweller

        at 9:12 am

        I can’t speak to David’s intent and I’m not going to reread the article but I think it’s simply a reference to his past posts regarding his baseball kids. You just gotta read his posts.

  9. Islanddweller

    at 6:04 pm

    My husband and I were able to become homeowners by working abroad for a number of years in a city that happened to have low taxes and decent salaries for our professions. It wasn’t a home-buying plan per se, but that’s how the path was paved. We weren’t particularly aggressive about saving, but we did always pay ourselves first, plus we paid into pension schemes in which our employers matched our contributions. We were able to take our winnings away wholesale when it came time to leave. As “expatriates”, we did not live a lavish lifestyle (which would have been easy to do), but we were by no means particularly frugal, either; upon repatriation we were able to make a sizeable downpayment on a home with our accumulated resources—accumulated as a couple, as Matthew pointed out. That’s how the chips fell for us. I know living abroad isn’t for everyone, but I wanted to share the perspective of a young person/couple inclined to leave home and see the world and make some money before finally putting down roots (and buying a house) back home. Maybe that era is over. The world certainly looks very different now.

    1. Condodweller

      at 10:06 am

      Working abroad is an excellent way to save money. I know several people who have done this. Expat positions tend to be higher paying jobs and they often come with a housing/food stipend. One person I know retired before 50 by only doing this for a few years prior to retiring. They had housing/food fully covered to the point where they even saved that. The pay yourself thing is not unique to expats. People have no problem blowing all their money and more at home.

  10. Condodweller

    at 10:30 am

    I think the millennial stigma of wanting everything NOW that older people have is somewhat justified. Being “old” means one had time to work and accumulate wealth through the process of normal saving and investing. When millennials grow older they will have more (at the same age) than the following generation. When people your age are ahead of you that’s when you need to evaluate what you are doing or not doing that resulted in where you are. There is nothing wrong with wanting something now. It’s whether you complain about it or get out there and work on it.

    I often hear people lamenting the fact that they are never going to own a home and yet they are not doing anything to work towards that goal.

    Sure, house prices are significantly higher for millennials but look at all the advantages they have. When I was entering the workforce, an average “worker” wasn’t able to invest in the stock market and those who did paid high commissions. Look at all the opportunities to earn extra income, sometimes insane amounts, through various ways on the internet. Often passively. If you start a business online, your potential client base could be the entire world. Compare that to an old style family business where you opened a storefront and perhaps put a few ads in the local paper.

    Let’s see what happens in the budget today. I heard “billions” again in the news when talking about new housing initiatives. I’m keeping an eye on that capital gain inclusion rate. I have not heard anything on that front, I hope we don’t get blindsided.

    1. Average Joe

      at 7:17 am

      It’s been well documented that millennials are hitting milestones much later in life than previous generations – there is plenty of data from reputable sources so I don’t see this as up for debate. It’s also well documented that wages have been stagnant and cost of living and for important investments like education and housing are soaring. And our GDP per capita has been actually declining in Canada for years. So older generations always say it was hard for them too, but things are getting measurably worse for younger generations – the West is in decline. People will get restless when the past looks brighter than the future.

      1. Condodweller

        at 9:25 am

        You should read my comment again. I didn’t debate it was more difficult, I was starting it’s not impossible. Instead of complaining about it, they should accept it for what it is and use the advantages they do have that I referenced and do something about it.

        This goes to David’s point about this everyone’s a winner attitude on school recently. It’s harder yes, but it’s doable. It may take some time, and it may require some compromises.

        1. Average Joe

          at 7:09 pm

          I agree with the hard work part. I don’t agree with the “don’t complain” part. Complaining about crappy parts of the system is how they improve. We wouldn’t have democracy, a five day work week or civil rights if nobody ever complained. Everyone has a right, and I would say an obligation to make themselves heard if things aren’t moving in the right direction.

  11. Numberco owner of R/E

    at 2:51 pm

    Love this write-up, Matthew. It is a blunt assessment. It all started from school, too: the prior generation probably got to buy houses in the city without completing much post-secondary education. Then, as I am sure I have read David saying before, we currently have an education system that generally does not push kids but promotes mediocrity (by saying “no one loses”). How are the future generations of Canadians ever going to compete, whether it comes to housing or otherwise?

    Sure, shelter is a right but the type of shelter and its location are not. Aside from entitlement, it speaks of selfishness. Why is the one who did not buy recently supposed to come out ahead when the market could have just as well declined?

    1. Landlord84

      at 1:13 pm

      Bingo.

  12. Mike Stevenson

    at 12:54 am

    Great stuff, Matthew. Really appreciate your realist takes on markets. And yes, it wouldn’t shock me if the “winners” of the bidding wars of the past 5 years don’t feel like winners soon, and the renters do.

  13. Landlord84

    at 1:26 pm

    Would love more comparisons to other well developed, major cities around the world. Especially ones with stock exchanges and high paying employment.

    1. Dickson L

      at 2:35 pm

      High-paying employment, sure, but I don’t think having a stock exchange in the city is all that relevant to the point. Sure, stock ownership is correlated with home ownership, but you don’t need to live near or go to a stock exchange to buy stocks anymore. These days you can buy stocks from around the world via online banking and trading platforms, and all you really need are money, discipline, and a working web connection.

Pick5 is a weekly series comparing and analyzing five residential properties based on price, style, location, and neighbourhood.

Search Posts